Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP November 2014 Newsletter: Court Rules That Constitution Does Not Empower Federal Government To Regulate A Threatened Species Living Only Within One State

Newsletter
November 24, 2014

 COURT RULES THAT CONSTITUTION DOES NOT EMPOWER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO REGULATE A THREATENED SPECIES LIVING ONLY WITHIN ONE STATE

A federal district court in Utah has ruled in People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service that Congress’s constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce does not enable the federal government to regulate under the Endangered Species Act a species that lives entirely in one state and that has no substantial effect on interstate commerce. Five appellate courts, the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits, have previously ruled otherwise with respect to other intrastate species, but the law has remained uncertain since those decisions have not been without dissent and they have offered differing rationales. If the latest ruling is appealed, it will give the Tenth Circuit, and perhaps ultimately the Supreme Court, an opportunity to weigh in.

More


David Ivester

Experienced Lawyers Dedicated to Excellence in The Practice of Land Use, Environmental, and Natural Resource Law

Disclaimer: In our Newsletters and Bulletins, Briscoe Ivester & Bazel llp intends to present general information to the public and does not intend to provide legal advice pertaining to a particular situation.

 

Image removed by sender.

Tags: , , , , ,