San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee
was set to tour crumbling piers with matchless views of the Bay Bridge
last week to showcase how hosting the America's Cup regatta would help
revitalize the city's aging waterfront.
Instead, the tour was hastily scrapped. Three hours later, the mayor
was before a bank of cameras acknowledging that 13 acres of concrete and
pilings known as Piers 30-32, which the city has tried unsuccessfully
to develop for decades, would no longer be rehabilitated to serve as
sailing team bases for the 2013 races.
While the regatta will go on, the shift probably cut hundreds of jobs
from the city's projections for hosting international sailing's premier
event. It also has triggered a reassessment over whether this signals
the end of major waterfront development, a temporary setback or a
turning point in how the city manages its bayfront as the Port of San
Francisco grapples with $2.2 billion in repair work it can't afford.
"We have a real problem," said Gabriel Metcalf, executive director of
the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a
public-policy and smart-growth think tank. "We have billions of dollars
of deferred maintenance on the port, and our only strategy is to hope
for these unique, one-off projects like the Ferry Building or the Giants
ballpark or the Exploratorium to come along and be willing to pay the
cost. There are not very many of those. They are few and far between,
and we just lost one of them."
The surprise decision by race organizers led by billionaire Oracle
co-founder Larry Ellison to dramatically reduce an investment in port
property for the regatta was quickly portrayed by Ellison's group and
city officials as a prudent move to ensure the regatta's success in a
new setting, where it is projected to draw millions of spectators, in
part because it will be readily visible from land rather than miles out
at sea.
The controversial real estate
component "was becoming a distraction to the whole race itself," Lee
said in a recent interview, and this put the focus back on the regatta.
By virtue of Ellison's Oracle Racing team winning the last Cup in
2010, Ellison, through his team's sponsor, San Francisco's Golden Gate
Yacht Club, decided the location of the next race.
A scaled-down deal
Details of a new deal with the city are expected this week, with the
Board of Supervisors to take it up March 27. Those involved in the talks
said the plan will be dramatically scaled back from one that several
members of the Board of Supervisors demanded revisions to last month
over concerns about the city's bottom line. That deal could have seen
the port reimbursing Ellison's regatta group, the America's Cup Event
Authority, with $111 million worth of rent-free leases, land,
development rights and other funding in exchange for repairing Piers
30-32 and other infrastructure work.
Under the new deal, the event authority is projected to spend about
$18 million on port upgrades, including improving public access to the
waterfront and helping to ready Piers 27 and 29 for use as the America's
Cup spectator village, said Stephen Barclay, the authority's main
negotiator. The talks center on how the city will reimburse that
investment.
"We were spending a lot more money than we anticipated," Barclay said
of the previous deal. "It involved a whole lot of process to get our
money back, and the (construction) time frames were unrealistically
tight."
Fewer benefits likely
In the process, the races' economic benefits appear blunted.
A 2010 city-commissioned study by Beacon Economics and the Bay Area
Council Economic Institute projected that hosting the Cup would generate
about $1.4 billion in economic activity in San Francisco and almost
9,000 jobs. The report also assumed 15 teams would participate. There
are currently only four, with a June 1 entry deadline. Infrastructure
work accounted for $159 million of that economic output and 770 jobs.
A separate analysis that year by the Board of Supervisors' budget
analyst projected economic benefit from the races ranging from $947
million to $1.6 billion.
While some infrastructure work will continue, primarily on Piers 27
and 29, the cost of rehabbing Piers 30-32 for the races was $60 million.
Millions more would have been needed to develop it.
More troubling for the port is the lost opportunity to get private
investors to front the money to rehabilitate a 100-year-old pier where
development plans have repeatedly foundered.
A troubled history
Scandinavian Center Inc.'s plan in 1990 for a cruise terminal,
exhibition hall and other uses for Piers 30-32 failed due to a lack of
financing.
more