<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bay Planning Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bayplanningcoalition.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:11:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CEQA Releases: Year in Review 2011 by BPC Staff</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2012/ceqa-releases-year-in-review-2011/#comment-2978</link>
		<dc:creator>BPC Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3753#comment-2978</guid>
		<description>Thank you for staying connected to BPC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for staying connected to BPC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CEQA Releases: Year in Review 2011 by Lennie Rae Cooke</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2012/ceqa-releases-year-in-review-2011/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennie Rae Cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3753#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this terrific summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this terrific summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 Workshop 3: LTMS and Nutrients: What are the Implications for the Bay&#8217;s Future? by BPC Staff</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/workshop-ltms-and-nutrients-what-are-the-implications-for-the-bays-future/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>BPC Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3062#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>I am hoping to secure the video this week.  

Jhn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping to secure the video this week.  </p>
<p>Jhn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 Workshop 3: LTMS and Nutrients: What are the Implications for the Bay&#8217;s Future? by linda dorn</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/workshop-ltms-and-nutrients-what-are-the-implications-for-the-bays-future/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>linda dorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3062#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>I would like to know if I can be notified of when a video of this 11/30 workshop is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know if I can be notified of when a video of this 11/30 workshop is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BPC&#8217;s Annual Membership Meeting and Luncheon by Mike Connor</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/bpcs-annual-membership-meeting-and-luncheon/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3411#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Save me a seat at your Annual mtg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save me a seat at your Annual mtg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SF Estuary Partnership &#8211; 11/2 Implementation Committee Meeting by Athena Honore</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/sf-estuary-partnership-112-implementation-committee-meeting/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena Honore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=3309#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>Note that the location of this meeting has changed to the MTC-ABAG Auditorium, at 101-8th Street in Oakland (steps from the Lake Merritt BART station). The time remains the same. The meeting location was changed in the hopes of avoiding potential transit and access impacts from the Occupy Oakland general strike. For parking or transit information for the new location, contact Athena Honore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the location of this meeting has changed to the MTC-ABAG Auditorium, at 101-8th Street in Oakland (steps from the Lake Merritt BART station). The time remains the same. The meeting location was changed in the hopes of avoiding potential transit and access impacts from the Occupy Oakland general strike. For parking or transit information for the new location, contact Athena Honore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dredging Timeline 2011 San Francisco Bay Area by jamie malone</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/dredging-timeline-2011-san-francisco-bay-area/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=2084#comment-750</guid>
		<description>I worked in dredging before,company name was Mike Hooks Dredging Inc. west lake Louisiana. I worked on pontoon line, operated work boats and also shift angors, also worked in levees, disconnect and connect pontoon lines.

Now I live here in Phoenix, Az 85015
(602) 670-2752</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked in dredging before,company name was Mike Hooks Dredging Inc. west lake Louisiana. I worked on pontoon line, operated work boats and also shift angors, also worked in levees, disconnect and connect pontoon lines.</p>
<p>Now I live here in Phoenix, Az 85015<br />
(602) 670-2752</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 Workshop 1: Is California Earthquake Tsunami Prepared? by Marvin Howard</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/workshop-series-2011-is-california-earthquake-tsunami-prepared/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=2158#comment-477</guid>
		<description>How will a 9.0 Earth Quake and projected Tsnuami on the Cascadia Suduction Zone effect the Greater Bay Area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will a 9.0 Earth Quake and projected Tsnuami on the Cascadia Suduction Zone effect the Greater Bay Area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact by Sponsorship Opportunities Workshop Series 2011 &#124; Bay Planning Coalition</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/contact/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sponsorship Opportunities Workshop Series 2011 &#124; Bay Planning Coalition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayplanningcoalition.org/?page_id=99#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] benefits as well as a Sponsorship Pledge Form.  For more information or to become a sponsor,please email us.Thank you for your continued investment in our important work.Michael Giari,PresidentRick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] benefits as well as a Sponsorship Pledge Form.  For more information or to become a sponsor,please email us.Thank you for your continued investment in our important work.Michael Giari,PresidentRick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Latest Updates on Creating U.S. Maritime Industry Jobs by Reducing Regulatory Burdens by Don</title>
		<link>http://bayplanningcoalition.org/2011/latest-updates-on-creating-u-s-maritime-industry-jobs-by-reducing-regulatory-burdens/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayplanningcoalition.org/?p=2070#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Anyone who follows the history of ballast water should realize that after Senator Boxer killed legislation in 2008 passed in the House 395-7, to protect us from ballast water  our politicians have been caving in to foreign shipping which constitutes the majority of flag ships in US waters. They currently have discussions going on in Congress concerning the economic problems this would create for shipping.  California&#039;s action reversing their stance for tough regulations despite Senator Boxers claim that the legislation she killed for the whole country was not strong enough, points out the political game they are playing with American health an environment. Not a single piece of new legislation has been introduced in Congress by either party since, and the EPA had to be sued to even address the idea of creating a standard. Our President as commander and chief, three years after allegedly supporting congressional legislation in 2008 has done nothing but allow a continuous delay on Coast Guard standards, the latest being a delay to &quot;correlate&quot; ( after the next presidential election) with a yet undeveloped EPA standard. New York&#039;s governor, as attorney general developed their purposed tough standards and has now delayed them in conjunction. It is about our dependence on foreign manufactured products to bolster our economy, and sadly although America was capable of putting a man on the moon, because shipping interest say that: &quot; technology is not out there &quot; significant action will probably never be taken. What ever weak action is taken environmentalist will have to accept and new shipping investments to develop a fix for the problem will be minimal as they know the political will is gone the same as many of the politicians who did care, Granholm, Schwarzenegger, Patterson, Strickland, Oberstar, etc. Interesting with the political help of our President, Senator Boxer the person responsible for killing national ballast water legislation was reelected. Not surprising since the issue of ballast water is never public-ally broad cast by the news media, despite the severe affects the way it is handled will affect both, Americans and the worlds health and environment  forever. The ironic travesty will be the way some who claim to care about environmental stewardship along with the shipping interest will portray weak action with respect and decorum as a great achievement, further destroying a chance for future significant actions. Shipping has won as this problem is not even close to being solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who follows the history of ballast water should realize that after Senator Boxer killed legislation in 2008 passed in the House 395-7, to protect us from ballast water  our politicians have been caving in to foreign shipping which constitutes the majority of flag ships in US waters. They currently have discussions going on in Congress concerning the economic problems this would create for shipping.  California&#8217;s action reversing their stance for tough regulations despite Senator Boxers claim that the legislation she killed for the whole country was not strong enough, points out the political game they are playing with American health an environment. Not a single piece of new legislation has been introduced in Congress by either party since, and the EPA had to be sued to even address the idea of creating a standard. Our President as commander and chief, three years after allegedly supporting congressional legislation in 2008 has done nothing but allow a continuous delay on Coast Guard standards, the latest being a delay to &#8220;correlate&#8221; ( after the next presidential election) with a yet undeveloped EPA standard. New York&#8217;s governor, as attorney general developed their purposed tough standards and has now delayed them in conjunction. It is about our dependence on foreign manufactured products to bolster our economy, and sadly although America was capable of putting a man on the moon, because shipping interest say that: &#8221; technology is not out there &#8221; significant action will probably never be taken. What ever weak action is taken environmentalist will have to accept and new shipping investments to develop a fix for the problem will be minimal as they know the political will is gone the same as many of the politicians who did care, Granholm, Schwarzenegger, Patterson, Strickland, Oberstar, etc. Interesting with the political help of our President, Senator Boxer the person responsible for killing national ballast water legislation was reelected. Not surprising since the issue of ballast water is never public-ally broad cast by the news media, despite the severe affects the way it is handled will affect both, Americans and the worlds health and environment  forever. The ironic travesty will be the way some who claim to care about environmental stewardship along with the shipping interest will portray weak action with respect and decorum as a great achievement, further destroying a chance for future significant actions. Shipping has won as this problem is not even close to being solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

